WIth @scowling incredible help I managed to get the AMDLibrary to work, even if the user removes the Eyefinity configuration. AMDLibrary is now clever enough to automatically recreate the SLSMap even if the user has deleted it! This is a great robustness improvement, and will help reduce my support calls greatly!
There was a problem with the unused display config containing null values on save, which meant that the JSON would be invalid when loaded in the next time. The fix was to ensure that both NVIDIA and AMD both were filled with a default config when a new profiles was created. This means that the real config would overwrite whichever config was needed, and the JSON file would work as all objects were populated correctly!
This is the first actual working version of the AMDLibrary from AMDInfo v1.0.0. This is the first time that all 3 different video libraries are in DisplayMagician and working (mostly). The AMD Screens structu creation logic in ProfileItem still needs to be updated to cope with the AMD Eyefinity configuration, but it at least defaults to the windows one at the moment so it doesn't crash (whew).
Also managed to bugfix the recent libraryfolder.vdf parsing change that a recent Steam Library change oforced on us. The logic wasn't working, and so the parsing didn't work, which in turn caused an exception when it came time to look up the game shortcut validity.
Windows changes the display source order which mucks up the equality matching in DM. This change attempts to mitigate that fact.
There were also errors in the HDR settings captured, which indicate that the HDR changes weren't finishing before they were being recorded. This change attempts to take care of that too.
All tests so far seem to work, so lets see how things go!
It was set to Error instead of Trace! Corrected now.
Also corrected some incorrect log message descriptions that will mean I look at the right code when I see the errors. There were all the same (as I copied a lot of the code).
Used new derived class equality class from https://codinghelmet.com/articles/equals-override which helped me understand the logic for deriving equality between base classes and derived classes. It has now exposed another error in the way FORCED_VIDEO_MODE is being applied and that is now something else I need to fix!
Have almost integrated the new CCD, AMD and NVIDIA
libraries into DIsplayMagician. The CCD library is working
fine. The AMD library is partially completed, but is awaiting
some help from AMD, as it appears one of their driver functions
is broken (or at least incorrectly documented). The NVIDIA
library is currently still under development, but I've still copied
it across so that I could work on the additional profile objects
that need to be prepared in order for this to work.
As I am waiting on a response from AMD, the plan is now that
I will swap over to an NVIDIA based video card in my test machines
and I will start work on the NVIDIA library. The NVIDIA library seems
straight forward compared to AMD, so that hopefully won't take too
long to do. Once that library is compete, I'll test it within NVIDIAInfo
application until its working, and then I'll port it back over to
DisplayMagician. That will then let me complete the last bits of the
integration so that I can complete the last of the NVIDIA tests.
Hopefully by the time all this happens I will have heard back from
AMD and I will be able to continue work with that section of code.
Added some basic CCD library functionality
to be able to set Windows displays directly
from the code. This will enable future native
HDR support through windows, as well as
allow positioning and screen setup to work
better through here than via the AMD driver.
Will still need to work on AMD Eyefinity support
once this is completed.
Now have the DisplayProfile storing the minimal set of
data that it needs. It also recreates the Screens list (used
for creating profile bitmaps and icons) and recreates the
DisplayProfileBitmaps each time at present. I will add some
logic to deerialise the bitmaps again at a later date once
I've compeleted actually applying the AMD display confs.
Have managed to get a working displayview
for AMD (not working in spanned mode) and
currently playing with the colours and layout.
Once I have something locked in, I'll troubleshoot
the ProfileDisplay file writing.
Trying to figure out a video card agnostic way
of generating the display icons fo both standard
and spanned displays. Still trying to figure out
exactly which AMD ADL calls I need to make to
get all the information I need. It is NOT very well
documented. It's actually really annoying! AMD
need to do better.
This is part of the new strategy to split the
ProfileItems into different derived clases with
one per Video card technology. The purpose is
to allow each video card driver to produce a
slightly different profiledata section which is
customised to the needs of that video card.
This will allieviate the need for us to extend
the Path object to support AMD, as we'll be
doing the differentiation at each ProfileItem.
Time will tell if this is a better strategy or not.
This is all to do with my even longer term
strategy of devloping video card driver library
files inhouse. This strategy was directly created
just so that I can make changes in my own code
if I need to support some additional features
such as HDR support within the profiles. It is very
difficult to do this if I'm using another video card
library. Much more simple to update my own code!
Moving to a situation where each library has
it's own ProfileData structure which will require
me to break the existing Profile structure.
This will be better once finished, but it could
be a month before I get this rewrite finished :/
Decided that the DisplayProfile changes would
have to be breaking changes if I was going to
add HDR support, and be able to handle adding
future video cards from different manufacturers.
This all requires a change to the DisplayProfile
format. So now this is going to use a file called
DisplayProfiles_2.0.json rather than a file called
DisplayProfiles_1.0.json. This is because the
profiles will need to be generated again from
scratch, as they will all be completely different
to the format in DisplayProfiles_1.0.json.
We have to do this as we will be moving
to a new video card library-based way of
getting the Display Profiles information.
This is designed to enable me to add new
video card drivers in the future, such as
Intel, in order to support 'combined'
video screens,
