Have almost integrated the new CCD, AMD and NVIDIA
libraries into DIsplayMagician. The CCD library is working
fine. The AMD library is partially completed, but is awaiting
some help from AMD, as it appears one of their driver functions
is broken (or at least incorrectly documented). The NVIDIA
library is currently still under development, but I've still copied
it across so that I could work on the additional profile objects
that need to be prepared in order for this to work.
As I am waiting on a response from AMD, the plan is now that
I will swap over to an NVIDIA based video card in my test machines
and I will start work on the NVIDIA library. The NVIDIA library seems
straight forward compared to AMD, so that hopefully won't take too
long to do. Once that library is compete, I'll test it within NVIDIAInfo
application until its working, and then I'll port it back over to
DisplayMagician. That will then let me complete the last bits of the
integration so that I can complete the last of the NVIDIA tests.
Hopefully by the time all this happens I will have heard back from
AMD and I will be able to continue work with that section of code.
This is part of the new strategy to split the
ProfileItems into different derived clases with
one per Video card technology. The purpose is
to allow each video card driver to produce a
slightly different profiledata section which is
customised to the needs of that video card.
This will allieviate the need for us to extend
the Path object to support AMD, as we'll be
doing the differentiation at each ProfileItem.
Time will tell if this is a better strategy or not.
This is all to do with my even longer term
strategy of devloping video card driver library
files inhouse. This strategy was directly created
just so that I can make changes in my own code
if I need to support some additional features
such as HDR support within the profiles. It is very
difficult to do this if I'm using another video card
library. Much more simple to update my own code!
