2023-12-01 04:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
from typing import Optional
|
|
|
|
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
from fastapi import APIRouter, Body, HTTPException, Path, Query
|
2023-10-17 06:02:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from invokeai.app.api.dependencies import ApiDependencies
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
from invokeai.app.services.shared.pagination import PaginatedResults
|
2023-12-01 04:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
from invokeai.app.services.shared.sqlite.sqlite_common import SQLiteDirection
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
from invokeai.app.services.workflow_records.workflow_records_common import (
|
|
|
|
Workflow,
|
2023-12-01 08:36:38 +00:00
|
|
|
WorkflowCategory,
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
WorkflowNotFoundError,
|
|
|
|
WorkflowRecordDTO,
|
2023-11-29 12:37:11 +00:00
|
|
|
WorkflowRecordListItemDTO,
|
2023-12-01 04:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
WorkflowRecordOrderBy,
|
2023-11-29 12:37:11 +00:00
|
|
|
WorkflowWithoutID,
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
2023-10-17 06:02:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
workflows_router = APIRouter(prefix="/v1/workflows", tags=["workflows"])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@workflows_router.get(
|
|
|
|
"/i/{workflow_id}",
|
|
|
|
operation_id="get_workflow",
|
|
|
|
responses={
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
200: {"model": WorkflowRecordDTO},
|
2023-10-17 06:02:15 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
async def get_workflow(
|
|
|
|
workflow_id: str = Path(description="The workflow to get"),
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
) -> WorkflowRecordDTO:
|
2023-10-17 06:02:15 +00:00
|
|
|
"""Gets a workflow"""
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
return ApiDependencies.invoker.services.workflow_records.get(workflow_id)
|
|
|
|
except WorkflowNotFoundError:
|
|
|
|
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Workflow not found")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@workflows_router.patch(
|
|
|
|
"/i/{workflow_id}",
|
|
|
|
operation_id="update_workflow",
|
|
|
|
responses={
|
2023-11-30 08:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
200: {"model": WorkflowRecordDTO},
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
async def update_workflow(
|
|
|
|
workflow: Workflow = Body(description="The updated workflow", embed=True),
|
|
|
|
) -> WorkflowRecordDTO:
|
|
|
|
"""Updates a workflow"""
|
|
|
|
return ApiDependencies.invoker.services.workflow_records.update(workflow=workflow)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@workflows_router.delete(
|
|
|
|
"/i/{workflow_id}",
|
|
|
|
operation_id="delete_workflow",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
async def delete_workflow(
|
|
|
|
workflow_id: str = Path(description="The workflow to delete"),
|
|
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
|
|
"""Deletes a workflow"""
|
|
|
|
ApiDependencies.invoker.services.workflow_records.delete(workflow_id)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@workflows_router.post(
|
|
|
|
"/",
|
|
|
|
operation_id="create_workflow",
|
|
|
|
responses={
|
|
|
|
200: {"model": WorkflowRecordDTO},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
async def create_workflow(
|
2023-11-29 12:37:11 +00:00
|
|
|
workflow: WorkflowWithoutID = Body(description="The workflow to create", embed=True),
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
) -> WorkflowRecordDTO:
|
|
|
|
"""Creates a workflow"""
|
2023-12-01 08:36:38 +00:00
|
|
|
return ApiDependencies.invoker.services.workflow_records.create(workflow=workflow)
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@workflows_router.get(
|
|
|
|
"/",
|
|
|
|
operation_id="list_workflows",
|
|
|
|
responses={
|
2023-11-29 12:37:11 +00:00
|
|
|
200: {"model": PaginatedResults[WorkflowRecordListItemDTO]},
|
feat(backend): update workflows handling
Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
2023-11-28 13:16:39 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
async def list_workflows(
|
|
|
|
page: int = Query(default=0, description="The page to get"),
|
|
|
|
per_page: int = Query(default=10, description="The number of workflows per page"),
|
2023-12-01 04:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
order_by: WorkflowRecordOrderBy = Query(default=WorkflowRecordOrderBy.Name, description="The order by"),
|
|
|
|
direction: SQLiteDirection = Query(default=SQLiteDirection.Ascending, description="The order by"),
|
2023-12-01 08:36:38 +00:00
|
|
|
category: WorkflowCategory = Query(default=WorkflowCategory.User, description="The category to get"),
|
2023-12-01 04:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
filter_text: Optional[str] = Query(default=None, description="The name to filter by"),
|
2023-11-29 12:37:11 +00:00
|
|
|
) -> PaginatedResults[WorkflowRecordListItemDTO]:
|
|
|
|
"""Gets a page of workflows"""
|
2023-12-01 04:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
return ApiDependencies.invoker.services.workflow_records.get_many(
|
2023-12-01 08:36:38 +00:00
|
|
|
page=page, per_page=per_page, order_by=order_by, direction=direction, filter_text=filter_text, category=category
|
2023-12-01 04:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|