Update VARIATIONS.md

Remove <figure markdown> tags.
This commit is contained in:
Lincoln Stein 2022-09-21 03:08:40 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent e91aad6527
commit 6987c77e2a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -45,10 +45,7 @@ Outputs:
./outputs/Xena/000001.3357757885.png: "prompt" -s50 -W512 -H512 -C7.5 -Ak_lms -S3357757885 ./outputs/Xena/000001.3357757885.png: "prompt" -s50 -W512 -H512 -C7.5 -Ak_lms -S3357757885
``` ```
<figure markdown>
![var1](../assets/variation_walkthru/000001.3357757885.png) ![var1](../assets/variation_walkthru/000001.3357757885.png)
<figcaption>Seed 3357757885 looks nice</figcaption>
</figure>
--- ---
@ -80,15 +77,9 @@ used to generate it.
This gives us a series of closely-related variations, including the two shown This gives us a series of closely-related variations, including the two shown
here. here.
<figure markdown>
![var2](../assets/variation_walkthru/000002.3647897225.png) ![var2](../assets/variation_walkthru/000002.3647897225.png)
<figcaption>subseed 3647897225</figcaption>
</figure>
<figure markdown>
![var3](../assets/variation_walkthru/000002.1614299449.png) ![var3](../assets/variation_walkthru/000002.1614299449.png)
<figcaption>subseed 1614299449</figcaption>
</figure>
I like the expression on Xena's face in the first one (subseed 3647897225), and I like the expression on Xena's face in the first one (subseed 3647897225), and
the armor on her shoulder in the second one (subseed 1614299449). Can we combine the armor on her shoulder in the second one (subseed 1614299449). Can we combine
@ -106,9 +97,7 @@ Outputs:
Here we are providing equal weights (0.1 and 0.1) for both the subseeds. The Here we are providing equal weights (0.1 and 0.1) for both the subseeds. The
resulting image is close, but not exactly what I wanted: resulting image is close, but not exactly what I wanted:
<figure markdown>
![var4](../assets/variation_walkthru/000003.1614299449.png) ![var4](../assets/variation_walkthru/000003.1614299449.png)
</figure>
We could either try combining the images with different weights, or we can We could either try combining the images with different weights, or we can
generate more variations around the almost-but-not-quite image. We do the generate more variations around the almost-but-not-quite image. We do the
@ -129,10 +118,7 @@ Outputs:
This produces six images, all slight variations on the combination of the chosen This produces six images, all slight variations on the combination of the chosen
two images. Here's the one I like best: two images. Here's the one I like best:
<figure markdown>
![var5](../assets/variation_walkthru/000004.3747154981.png) ![var5](../assets/variation_walkthru/000004.3747154981.png)
<figcaption>000004.3747154981.png</figcaption>
</figure>
As you can see, this is a very powerful tool, which when combined with subprompt As you can see, this is a very powerful tool, which when combined with subprompt
weighting, gives you great control over the content and quality of your weighting, gives you great control over the content and quality of your