mirror of
https://github.com/invoke-ai/InvokeAI
synced 2024-08-30 20:32:17 +00:00
Add better documentation/errors around the possibility that inpainting models may be incorrectly labelled as non-inpainting models.
This commit is contained in:
parent
416d29fb83
commit
9db0e9d696
@ -775,6 +775,10 @@ class DenoiseLatentsInvocation(BaseInvocation):
|
||||
|
||||
### inpaint
|
||||
mask, masked_latents, is_gradient_mask = self.prep_inpaint_mask(context, latents)
|
||||
# NOTE: We used to identify inpainting models by inpecting the shape of the loaded UNet model weights. Now we
|
||||
# use the ModelVariantType config. During testing, there was a report of a user with models that had an
|
||||
# incorrect ModelVariantType value. Re-installing the model fixed the issue. If this issue turns out to be
|
||||
# prevalent, we will have to revisit how we initialize the inpainting extensions.
|
||||
if unet_config.variant == ModelVariantType.Inpaint:
|
||||
ext_manager.add_extension(InpaintModelExt(mask, masked_latents, is_gradient_mask))
|
||||
elif mask is not None:
|
||||
|
@ -75,7 +75,11 @@ class InpaintExt(ExtensionBase):
|
||||
@callback(ExtensionCallbackType.PRE_DENOISE_LOOP)
|
||||
def init_tensors(self, ctx: DenoiseContext):
|
||||
if not self._is_normal_model(ctx.unet):
|
||||
raise ValueError("InpaintExt should be used only on normal models!")
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
"InpaintExt should be used only on normal (non-inpainting) models. This could be caused by an "
|
||||
"inpainting model that was incorrectly marked as a non-inpainting model. In some cases, this can be "
|
||||
"fixed by removing and re-adding the model (so that it gets re-probed)."
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self._mask = self._mask.to(device=ctx.latents.device, dtype=ctx.latents.dtype)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user