This is intended for debug usage, so it's hidden away in the workflow library `...` menu. Hold shift to see the button for it.
- Paste a graph (from a network request, for example) and then click the convert button to convert it to a workflow.
- Disable auto layout to stack the nodes with an offset (try it out). If you change this, you must re-convert to get the changes.
- Edit the workflow JSON if you need to tweak something before loading it.
This data is already in the template but it wasn't ever used.
One big place where this improves UX is the noise node. Previously, the UI let you change width and height in increments of 1, despite the template requiring a multiple of 8. It now works in multiples of 8.
Retrieving the DTO happens as part of the metadata parsing, not recall. This way, we don't show the option to recall a nonexistent image.
This matches the flow for other metadata entities like models - we don't show the model recall button if the model isn't available.
The valid values for this parameter changed when inpainting changed to gradient denoise. The generation slice's redux migration wasn't updated, resulting in a generation error until you change the setting or reset web UI.
- Add and use more performant `deepClone` method for deep copying throughout the UI.
Benchmarks indicate the Really Fast Deep Clone library (`rfdc`) is the best all-around way to deep-clone large objects.
This is particularly relevant in canvas. When drawing or otherwise manipulating canvas objects, we need to do a lot of deep cloning of the canvas layer state objects.
Previously, we were using lodash's `cloneDeep`.
I did some fairly realistic benchmarks with a handful of deep-cloning algorithms/libraries (including the native `structuredClone`). I used a snapshot of the canvas state as the data to be copied:
On Chromium, `rfdc` is by far the fastest, over an order of magnitude faster than `cloneDeep`.
On FF, `fastest-json-copy` and `recursiveDeepCopy` are even faster, but are rather limited in data types. `rfdc`, while only half as fast as the former 2, is still nearly an order of magnitude faster than `cloneDeep`.
On Safari, `structuredClone` is the fastest, about 2x as fast as `cloneDeep`. `rfdc` is only 30% faster than `cloneDeep`.
`rfdc`'s peak memory usage is about 10% more than `cloneDeep` on Chrome. I couldn't get memory measurements from FF and Safari, but let's just assume the memory usage is similar relative to the other algos.
Overall, `rfdc` is the best choice for a single algo for all browsers. It's definitely the best for Chromium, by far the most popular desktop browser and thus our primary target.
A future enhancement might be to detect the browser and use that to determine which algorithm to use.
