## What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
- [ ] Refactor
- [z] Feature
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Optimization
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Community Node Submission
## Description
Single query, with simple wrapper hooks (type-safe). Updated everywhere
in frontend.
## QA Instructions, Screenshots, Recordings
Things that use models should work. All of this code is strictly
typechecked, so we can be confident in this change.
<!--
Please provide steps on how to test changes, any hardware or
software specifications as well as any other pertinent information.
-->
## Merge Plan
This PR can be merged when approved
<!--
A merge plan describes how this PR should be handled after it is
approved.
Example merge plans:
- "This PR can be merged when approved"
- "This must be squash-merged when approved"
- "DO NOT MERGE - I will rebase and tidy commits before merging"
- "#dev-chat on discord needs to be advised of this change when it is
merged"
A merge plan is particularly important for large PRs or PRs that touch
the
database in any way.
-->
We were passing a PIL image when we needed to pass the np image.
Closes#5956
## What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
- [ ] Refactor
- [ ] Feature
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Optimization
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Community Node Submission
## Description
We were passing a PIL image when we needed to pass the np image.
Closes#5956
## Related Tickets & Documents
<!--
For pull requests that relate or close an issue, please include them
below.
For example having the text: "closes #1234" would connect the current
pull
request to issue 1234. And when we merge the pull request, Github will
automatically close the issue.
-->
- Related Issue #
- Closes#5956
## QA Instructions, Screenshots, Recordings
Depth anything processor should work.
<!--
Please provide steps on how to test changes, any hardware or
software specifications as well as any other pertinent information.
-->
## Merge Plan
This PR can be merged when approved
<!--
A merge plan describes how this PR should be handled after it is
approved.
Example merge plans:
- "This PR can be merged when approved"
- "This must be squash-merged when approved"
- "DO NOT MERGE - I will rebase and tidy commits before merging"
- "#dev-chat on discord needs to be advised of this change when it is
merged"
A merge plan is particularly important for large PRs or PRs that touch
the
database in any way.
-->
- This adds additional logic to the safetensors->diffusers conversion script
to check for and install missing core conversion models at runtime.
- Fixes#5934
BLAKE3 has poor performance on spinning disks when parallelized. See https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3/issues/31
- Replace `skip_model_hash` setting with `hashing_algorithm`. Any algorithm we support is accepted.
- Add `random` algorithm: hashes a UUID with BLAKE3 to create a random "hash". Equivalent to the previous skip functionality.
- Add `blake3_single` algorithm: hashes on a single thread using BLAKE3, fixes the aforementioned performance issue
- Update model probe to accept the algorithm to hash with as an optional arg, defaulting to `blake3`
- Update all calls of the probe to use the app's configured hashing algorithm
- Update an external script that probes models
- Update tests
- Move ModelHash into its own module to avoid circuclar import issues
This script removes unused translations from the `en.json` source translation file:
- Parse `en.json` to build a list of all keys, e.g. `controlnet.depthAnything`
- Check every frontend file for every key
- If the key is not found, it is removed from the translation file
- Exact matches (e.g. `controlnet.depthAnything`) and stem matches (e.g. `depthAnything`) are ignored
The graph builders used awaited functions within `Array.prototype.forEach` loops. This doesn't do what you'd think. This caused graphs to be enqueued before they were fully constructed.
Changed to `for..of` loops to fix this.
There wasn't enough validation of control adapters during graph building. It would be possible for a graph to be built with empty collect node, causing an error. Addressed with an extra check.
This should never happen in practice, because the invoke button should be disabled if an invalid CA is active.
## What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
- [x] Optimization
## Description
Was merged into next but never carried over to main. So cleaning up
again.
