Update workflows handling for Workflow Library.
**Updated Workflow Storage**
"Embedded Workflows" are workflows associated with images, and are now only stored in the image files. "Library Workflows" are not associated with images, and are stored only in DB.
This works out nicely. We have always saved workflows to files, but recently began saving them to the DB in addition to in image files. When that happened, we stopped reading workflows from files, so all the workflows that only existed in images were inaccessible. With this change, access to those workflows is restored, and no workflows are lost.
**Updated Workflow Handling in Nodes**
Prior to this change, workflows were embedded in images by passing the whole workflow JSON to a special workflow field on a node. In the node's `invoke()` function, the node was able to access this workflow and save it with the image. This (inaccurately) models workflows as a property of an image and is rather awkward technically.
A workflow is now a property of a batch/session queue item. It is available in the InvocationContext and therefore available to all nodes during `invoke()`.
**Database Migrations**
Added a `SQLiteMigrator` class to handle database migrations. Migrations were needed to accomodate the DB-related changes in this PR. See the code for details.
The `images`, `workflows` and `session_queue` tables required migrations for this PR, and are using the new migrator. Other tables/services are still creating tables themselves. A followup PR will adapt them to use the migrator.
**Other/Support Changes**
- Add a `has_workflow` column to `images` table to indicate that the image has an embedded workflow.
- Add handling for retrieving the workflow from an image in python. The image file must be fetched, the workflow extracted, and then sent to client, avoiding needing the browser to parse the image file. With the `has_workflow` column, the UI knows if there is a workflow to be fetched, and only fetches when the user requests to load the workflow.
- Add route to get the workflow from an image
- Add CRUD service/routes for the library workflows
- `workflow_images` table and services removed (no longer needed now that embedded workflows are not in the DB)
Refactor services folder/module structure.
**Motivation**
While working on our services I've repeatedly encountered circular imports and a general lack of clarity regarding where to put things. The structure introduced goes a long way towards resolving those issues, setting us up for a clean structure going forward.
**Services**
Services are now in their own folder with a few files:
- `services/{service_name}/__init__.py`: init as needed, mostly empty now
- `services/{service_name}/{service_name}_base.py`: the base class for the service
- `services/{service_name}/{service_name}_{impl_type}.py`: the default concrete implementation of the service - typically one of `sqlite`, `default`, or `memory`
- `services/{service_name}/{service_name}_common.py`: any common items - models, exceptions, utilities, etc
Though it's a bit verbose to have the service name both as the folder name and the prefix for files, I found it is _extremely_ confusing to have all of the base classes just be named `base.py`. So, at the cost of some verbosity when importing things, I've included the service name in the filename.
There are some minor logic changes. For example, in `InvocationProcessor`, instead of assigning the model manager service to a variable to be used later in the file, the service is used directly via the `Invoker`.
**Shared**
Things that are used across disparate services are in `services/shared/`:
- `default_graphs.py`: previously in `services/`
- `graphs.py`: previously in `services/`
- `paginatation`: generic pagination models used in a few services
- `sqlite`: the `SqliteDatabase` class, other sqlite-specific things
