This is intended for debug usage, so it's hidden away in the workflow library `...` menu. Hold shift to see the button for it.
- Paste a graph (from a network request, for example) and then click the convert button to convert it to a workflow.
- Disable auto layout to stack the nodes with an offset (try it out). If you change this, you must re-convert to get the changes.
- Edit the workflow JSON if you need to tweak something before loading it.
- Allow user-defined precision on MPS.
- Use more explicit logic to handle all possible cases.
- Add comments.
- Remove the app_config args (they were effectively unused, just get the config using the singleton getter util)
This data is already in the template but it wasn't ever used.
One big place where this improves UX is the noise node. Previously, the UI let you change width and height in increments of 1, despite the template requiring a multiple of 8. It now works in multiples of 8.
Retrieving the DTO happens as part of the metadata parsing, not recall. This way, we don't show the option to recall a nonexistent image.
This matches the flow for other metadata entities like models - we don't show the model recall button if the model isn't available.
Currently translated at 73.3% (826 of 1126 strings)
Co-authored-by: Alexander Eichhorn <pfannkuchensack@einfach-doof.de>
Translate-URL: https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/invokeai/web-ui/de/
Translation: InvokeAI/Web UI
The previous algorithm errored if the image wasn't divisible by the tile size. I've reimplemented it from scratch to mitigate this issue.
The new algorithm is simpler. We create a pool of tiles, then use them to create an image composed completely of tiles. If there is any awkwardly sized space on the edge of the image, the tiles are cropped to fit.
Finally, paste the original image over the tile image.
I've added a jupyter notebook to do a smoke test of infilling methods, and 10 test images.
The other infill algorithms can be easily tested with the notebook on the same images, though I didn't set that up yet.
Tested and confirmed this gives results just as good as the earlier infill, though of course they aren't the same due to the change in the algorithm.
