Consolidate graph processing logic into session processor.
With graphs as the unit of work, and the session queue distributing graphs, we no longer need the invocation queue or processor.
Instead, the session processor dequeues the next session and processes it in a simple loop, greatly simplifying the app.
- Remove `graph_execution_manager` service.
- Remove `queue` (invocation queue) service.
- Remove `processor` (invocation processor) service.
- Remove queue-related logic from `Invoker`. It now only starts and stops the services, providing them with access to other services.
- Remove unused `invocation_retrieval_error` and `session_retrieval_error` events, these are no longer needed.
- Clean up stats service now that it is less coupled to the rest of the app.
- Refactor cancellation logic - cancellations now originate from session queue (i.e. HTTP cancel endpoint) and are emitted as events. Processor gets the events and sets the canceled event. Access to this event is provided to the invocation context for e.g. the step callback.
- Remove `sessions` router; it provided access to `graph_executions` but that no longer exists.
`GraphInvocation` is a node that can contain a whole graph. It is removed for a number of reasons:
1. This feature was unused (the UI doesn't support it) and there is no plan for it to be used.
The use-case it served is known in other node execution engines as "node groups" or "blocks" - a self-contained group of nodes, which has group inputs and outputs. This is a planned feature that will be handled client-side.
2. It adds substantial complexity to the graph processing logic. It's probably not enough to have a measurable performance impact but it does make it harder to work in the graph logic.
3. It allows for graphs to be recursive, and the improved invocations union handling does not play well with it. Actually, it works fine within `graph.py` but not in the tests for some reason. I do not understand why. There's probably a workaround, but I took this as encouragement to remove `GraphInvocation` from the app since we don't use it.
The change to `Graph.nodes` and `GraphExecutionState.results` validation requires some fanagling to get the OpenAPI schema generation to work. See new comments for a details.
We use pydantic to validate a union of valid invocations when instantiating a graph.
Previously, we constructed the union while creating the `Graph` class. This introduces a dependency on the order of imports.
For example, consider a setup where we have 3 invocations in the app:
- Python executes the module where `FirstInvocation` is defined, registering `FirstInvocation`.
- Python executes the module where `SecondInvocation` is defined, registering `SecondInvocation`.
- Python executes the module where `Graph` is defined. A union of invocations is created and used to define the `Graph.nodes` field. The union contains `FirstInvocation` and `SecondInvocation`.
- Python executes the module where `ThirdInvocation` is defined, registering `ThirdInvocation`.
- A graph is created that includes `ThirdInvocation`. Pydantic validates the graph using the union, which does not know about `ThirdInvocation`, raising a `ValidationError` about an unknown invocation type.
This scenario has been particularly problematic in tests, where we may create invocations dynamically. The test files have to be structured in such a way that the imports happen in the right order. It's a major pain.
This PR refactors the validation of graph nodes to resolve this issue:
- `BaseInvocation` gets a new method `get_typeadapter`. This builds a pydantic `TypeAdapter` for the union of all registered invocations, caching it after the first call.
- `Graph.nodes`'s type is widened to `dict[str, BaseInvocation]`. This actually is a nice bonus, because we get better type hints whenever we reference `some_graph.nodes`.
- A "plain" field validator takes over the validation logic for `Graph.nodes`. "Plain" validators totally override pydantic's own validation logic. The validator grabs the `TypeAdapter` from `BaseInvocation`, then validates each node with it. The validation is identical to the previous implementation - we get the same errors.
`BaseInvocationOutput` gets the same treatment.
