This simply hides nodes from the workflow editor. The nodes will still work if an API request is made with them. For example, you could hide `iterate` nodes from the workflow editor, but if the Linear UI makes use of those nodes, they will still function.
- Update `AppConfig` with optional property `nodesDenylist: string[]`
- If provided, nodes are filtered out by `type` in the workflow editor
* Consolidated saturation/luminosity adjust.
Now allows increasing and inverting.
Accepts any color PIL format and channel designation.
* Updated docs/nodes/defaultNodes.md
* shortened tags list to channel types only
* fix typo in mode list
* split features into offset and multiply nodes
* Updated documentation
* Change invert to discrete boolean.
Previous math was unclear and had issues with 0 values.
* chore: black
* chore(ui): typegen
---------
Co-authored-by: psychedelicious <4822129+psychedelicious@users.noreply.github.com>
- Node versions are now added to node templates
- Node data (including in workflows) include the version of the node
- On loading a workflow, we check to see if the node and template versions match exactly. If not, a warning is logged to console.
- The node info icon (top-right corner of node, which you may click to open the notes editor) now shows the version and mentions any issues.
- Some workflow validation logic has been shifted around and is now executed in a redux listener.
Initial support for polymorphic field types. Polymorphic types are a single of or list of a specific type. For example, `Union[str, list[str]]`.
Polymorphics do not yet have support for direct input in the UI (will come in the future). They will be forcibly set as Connection-only fields, in which case users will not be able to provide direct input to the field.
If a polymorphic should present as a singleton type - which would allow direct input - the node must provide an explicit type hint.
For example, `DenoiseLatents`' `CFG Scale` is polymorphic, but in the node editor, we want to present this as a number input. In the node definition, the field is given `ui_type=UIType.Float`, which tells the UI to treat this as a `float` field.
The connection validation logic will prevent connecting a collection to `CFG Scale` in this situation, because it is typed as `float`. The workaround is to disable validation from the settings to make this specific connection. A future improvement will resolve this.
This also introduces better support for collection field types. Like polymorphics, collection types are parsed automatically by the client and do not need any specific type hints.
Also like polymorphics, there is no support yet for direct input of collection types in the UI.
- Disabling validation in workflow editor now displays the visual hints for valid connections, but lets you connect to anything.
- Added `ui_order: int` to `InputField` and `OutputField`. The UI will use this, if present, to order fields in a node UI. See usage in `DenoiseLatents` for an example.
- Updated the field colors - duplicate colors have just been lightened a bit. It's not perfect but it was a quick fix.
- Field handles for collections are the same color as their single counterparts, but have a dark dot in the center of them.
- Field handles for polymorphics are a rounded square with dot in the middle.
- Removed all fields that just render `null` from `InputFieldRenderer`, replaced with a single fallback
- Removed logic in `zValidatedWorkflow`, which checked for existence of node templates for each node in a workflow. This logic introduced a circular dependency, due to importing the global redux `store` in order to get the node templates within a zod schema. It's actually fine to just leave this out entirely; The case of a missing node template is handled by the UI. Fixing it otherwise would introduce a substantial headache.
- Fixed the `ControlNetInvocation.control_model` field default, which was a string when it shouldn't have one.
Add a click handler for node wrapper component that exclusively selects that node, IF no other modifier keys are held.
Technically I believe this means we are doubling up on the selection logic, as reactflow handles this internally also. But this is by far the most reliable way to fix the UX.
