## Summary
This PR adds some spandrel upscale models to the starter model list.
In the future we may also want to add:
- Some DAT models
(https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1iBdf_-LVZuz_PAbFtuxSKd_11RL1YKxM)
## QA Instructions
I installed the starter models via the model manager UI, and tested that
I could use them in a workflow.
## Merge Plan
- [ ] Merge the preceding Spandrel PRs first, then change the target
branch to `main`.
## Checklist
- [x] _The PR has a short but descriptive title, suitable for a
changelog_
- [x] _Tests added / updated (if applicable)_
- [x] _Documentation added / updated (if applicable)_
## Summary
Add tiling to the `SpandrelImageToImageInvocation` node so that it can
process large images.
Tiling enables this node to run on effectively any input image
dimension. Of course, the computation time increases quadratically with
the image dimension.
Some profiling results on an RTX4090:
- Input 1024x1024, 4x upscale, 4x UltraSharp ESRGAN: `13 secs`, `<4 GB
VRAM`
- Input 4096x4096, 4x upscale, 4x UltraSharop ESRGAN: `46 secs`, `<4 GB
VRAM`
- Input 4096x4096, 2x upscale, SwinIR: `165 secs`, `<5 GB VRAM`
A lot of the time is spent PNG encoding the final image:
- PNG encoding of a 16384x16384 image takes `83secs @
pil_compress_level=7`, `24secs @ pil_compress_level=1`
Callout: If we want to start building workflows that pass large images
between nodes, we are going to have to find a way to avoid the PNG
encode/decode roundtrip that we are currently doing. As is, we will be
incurring a huge penalty for every node that receives/produces a large
image.
## QA Instructions
- [x] Tested with tiling up to 4096x4096 -> 16384x16384.
- [x] Test on images with an alpha channel (the alpha channel is
dropped).
- [x] Test on images with odd dimension.
- [x] Test no tiling (`tile_size=0`)
## Merge Plan
- [x] Merge #6556 first, and change the target branch to `main`.
## Checklist
- [x] _The PR has a short but descriptive title, suitable for a
changelog_
- [ ] _Tests added / updated (if applicable)_
- [x] _Documentation added / updated (if applicable)_
## Summary
- Add support for all
[spandrel](https://github.com/chaiNNer-org/spandrel) image-to-image
models - this is a collection of many popular super-resolution models
(e.g. ESRGAN, Real-ESRGAN, SwinIR, DAT, etc.)
Examples of supported models:
- DAT:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1iBdf_-LVZuz_PAbFtuxSKd_11RL1YKxM
- SwinIR: https://github.com/JingyunLiang/SwinIR/releases
- Any ESRGAN / Real-ESRGAN model
## Related Issues
Closes#6394
## QA Instructions
- [x] Test that unsupported models still fail the probe (i.e. no false
positive spandrel models)
- [x] Test adding a few non-spandrel model types
- [x] Test adding a handful of spandrel model types: ESRGAN,
Real-ESRGAN, SwinIR, DAT
- [x] Verify model size estimation for the model cache
- [x] Test using the spandrel models in a practical image upscaling
workflow
## Merge Plan
- [x] Get approval from @brandonrising and @maryhipp before merging -
this PR has commercial implications.
- [x] Merge #6571 and change the target branch to `main`
## Checklist
- [x] _The PR has a short but descriptive title, suitable for a
changelog_
- [x] _Tests added / updated (if applicable)_
- [x] _Documentation added / updated (if applicable)_
In #6490 we enabled non-blocking torch device transfers throughout the model manager's memory management code. When using this torch feature, torch attempts to wait until the tensor transfer has completed before allowing any access to the tensor. Theoretically, that should make this a safe feature to use.
This provides a small performance improvement but causes race conditions in some situations. Specific platforms/systems are affected, and complicated data dependencies can make this unsafe.
- Intermittent black images on MPS devices - reported on discord and #6545, fixed with special handling in #6549.
- Intermittent OOMs and black images on a P4000 GPU on Windows - reported in #6613, fixed in this commit.
On my system, I haven't experience any issues with generation, but targeted testing of non-blocking ops did expose a race condition when moving tensors from CUDA to CPU.
One workaround is to use torch streams with manual sync points. Our application logic is complicated enough that this would be a lot of work and feels ripe for edge cases and missed spots.
Much safer is to fully revert non-locking - which is what this change does.
This issue is caused by a race condition. When a large image is served to the client, it is done using a streaming `FileResponse`. This concurrently serves the image straight from disk. The file is kept open by FastAPI until the image is fully served.
When a user deletes an image before the file is done serving, the delete fails because the file is still held by FastAPI.
To reproduce the issue:
- Create a very large image (8k reliably creates the issue).
- Create a smaller image, so that the first image in the gallery is not the large image.
- Refresh the app. The small image should be selected.
- Select the large image and immediately delete it. You have to be fast, to delete it before it finishes loading.
- In the terminal, we expect to see an error saying `Failed to delete image file`, and the image does not disappear from the UI.
- After a short wait, once the image has fully loaded, try deleting it again. We expect this to work.
The workaround is to instead serve the image from memory.
Loading the image to memory is very fast, so there is only a tiny window in which we could create the race condition, but it technically could still occur, because FastAPI is asynchronous and handles requests concurrently.
Once we load the image into memory, deletions of that image will work. Then we return a normal `Response` object with the image bytes. This is essentially what `FileResponse` does - except it uses `anyio.open_file`, which is async.
The tradeoff is that the server thread is blocked while opening the file. I think this is a fair tradeoff.
A future enhancement could be to implement soft deletion of images (db is already set up for this), and then clean up deleted image files on startup/shutdown. We could move back to using the async `FileResponse` for best responsiveness in the server without any risk of race conditions.
For some reason, I started getting this indefinite hang when the app checks if port 9090 is available. After some fiddling around, I found that adding a timeout resolves the issue.
I confirmed that the util still works by starting the app on 9090, then starting a second instance. The second instance correctly saw 9090 in use and moved to 9091.
## Summary
This PR changes the handling of invalid model configs in the DB to log a
warning rather than crashing the app.
This change is being made in preparation for some upcoming new model
additions. Previously, if a user rolled back from an app version that
added a new model type, the app would not launch until the DB was fixed.
This PR changes this behaviour to allow rollbacks of this type (with
warnings).
**Keep in mind that this change is only helpful to users _rolling back
to a version that has this fix_. I.e. it offers no help in the first
version that includes it.**
## QA Instructions
1. Run the Spandrel model branch, which adds a new model type
https://github.com/invoke-ai/InvokeAI/pull/6556.
2. Add a spandrel model via the model manager.
3. Rollback to main. The app will crash on launch due to the invalid
spandrel model config.
4. Checkout this branch. The app should now run with warnings about the
invalid model config.
## Checklist
- [x] _The PR has a short but descriptive title, suitable for a
changelog_
- [ ] _Tests added / updated (if applicable)_
- [x] _Documentation added / updated (if applicable)_
Currently translated at 67.0% (859 of 1282 strings)
Co-authored-by: Alexander Eichhorn <pfannkuchensack@einfach-doof.de>
Translate-URL: https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/invokeai/web-ui/de/
Translation: InvokeAI/Web UI
Currently translated at 100.0% (1282 of 1282 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Russian)
Currently translated at 100.0% (1280 of 1280 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Russian)
Currently translated at 100.0% (1275 of 1275 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Russian)
Currently translated at 100.0% (1273 of 1273 strings)
Co-authored-by: Васянатор <ilabulanov339@gmail.com>
Translate-URL: https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/invokeai/web-ui/ru/
Translation: InvokeAI/Web UI
Currently translated at 98.2% (1260 of 1282 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Italian)
Currently translated at 98.4% (1260 of 1280 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Italian)
Currently translated at 98.4% (1255 of 1275 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Italian)
Currently translated at 98.4% (1253 of 1273 strings)
translationBot(ui): update translation (Italian)
Currently translated at 98.4% (1245 of 1265 strings)
Co-authored-by: Riccardo Giovanetti <riccardo.giovanetti@gmail.com>
Translate-URL: https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/invokeai/web-ui/it/
Translation: InvokeAI/Web UI
