The seamless logic errors when a second GPU is selected. I don't understand why, but a workaround is to skip the model patching when there there are no seamless axes specified.
This is also just a good practice regardless - don't patch the model unless we need to. Probably a negligible perf impact.
Closes#6010
- Replace AnyModelLoader with ModelLoaderRegistry
- Fix type check errors in multiple files
- Remove apparently unneeded `get_model_config_enum()` method from model manager
- Remove last vestiges of old model manager
- Updated tests and documentation
resolve conflict with seamless.py
- Replace legacy model manager service with the v2 manager.
- Update invocations to use new load interface.
- Fixed many but not all type checking errors in the invocations. Most
were unrelated to model manager
- Updated routes. All the new routes live under the route tag
`model_manager_v2`. To avoid confusion with the old routes,
they have the URL prefix `/api/v2/models`. The old routes
have been de-registered.
- Added a pytest for the loader.
- Updated documentation in contributing/MODEL_MANAGER.md
- Implement new model loader and modify invocations and embeddings
- Finish implementation loaders for all models currently supported by
InvokeAI.
- Move lora, textual_inversion, and model patching support into
backend/embeddings.
- Restore support for model cache statistics collection (a little ugly,
needs work).
- Fixed up invocations that load and patch models.
- Move seamless and silencewarnings utils into better location
If the user specifies `torch-sdp` as the attention type in `config.yaml`, we can go ahead and use it (if available) rather than always throwing an exception.
Also, the PREVIOUS commit (@8d3885d, which was already pushed to github repo) was wrongly commented, but too late to fix without a force push or other mucking that I'm reluctant to do. That commit is actually the one that has all the changes to diffusers_pipeline.py to use additional arg down_intrablock_additional_residuals (introduced in diffusers PR https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/5362) to detangle T2I-Adapter from ControlNet inputs to main UNet.
Upgrade pydantic and fastapi to latest.
- pydantic~=2.4.2
- fastapi~=103.2
- fastapi-events~=0.9.1
**Big Changes**
There are a number of logic changes needed to support pydantic v2. Most changes are very simple, like using the new methods to serialized and deserialize models, but there are a few more complex changes.
**Invocations**
The biggest change relates to invocation creation, instantiation and validation.
Because pydantic v2 moves all validation logic into the rust pydantic-core, we may no longer directly stick our fingers into the validation pie.
Previously, we (ab)used models and fields to allow invocation fields to be optional at instantiation, but required when `invoke()` is called. We directly manipulated the fields and invocation models when calling `invoke()`.
With pydantic v2, this is much more involved. Changes to the python wrapper do not propagate down to the rust validation logic - you have to rebuild the model. This causes problem with concurrent access to the invocation classes and is not a free operation.
This logic has been totally refactored and we do not need to change the model any more. The details are in `baseinvocation.py`, in the `InputField` function and `BaseInvocation.invoke_internal()` method.
In the end, this implementation is cleaner.
**Invocation Fields**
In pydantic v2, you can no longer directly add or remove fields from a model.
Previously, we did this to add the `type` field to invocations.
**Invocation Decorators**
With pydantic v2, we instead use the imperative `create_model()` API to create a new model with the additional field. This is done in `baseinvocation.py` in the `invocation()` wrapper.
A similar technique is used for `invocation_output()`.
**Minor Changes**
There are a number of minor changes around the pydantic v2 models API.
**Protected `model_` Namespace**
All models' pydantic-provided methods and attributes are prefixed with `model_` and this is considered a protected namespace. This causes some conflict, because "model" means something to us, and we have a ton of pydantic models with attributes starting with "model_".
Forunately, there are no direct conflicts. However, in any pydantic model where we define an attribute or method that starts with "model_", we must tell set the protected namespaces to an empty tuple.
```py
class IPAdapterModelField(BaseModel):
model_name: str = Field(description="Name of the IP-Adapter model")
base_model: BaseModelType = Field(description="Base model")
model_config = ConfigDict(protected_namespaces=())
```
**Model Serialization**
Pydantic models no longer have `Model.dict()` or `Model.json()`.
Instead, we use `Model.model_dump()` or `Model.model_dump_json()`.
**Model Deserialization**
Pydantic models no longer have `Model.parse_obj()` or `Model.parse_raw()`, and there are no `parse_raw_as()` or `parse_obj_as()` functions.
Instead, you need to create a `TypeAdapter` object to parse python objects or JSON into a model.
```py
adapter_graph = TypeAdapter(Graph)
deserialized_graph_from_json = adapter_graph.validate_json(graph_json)
deserialized_graph_from_dict = adapter_graph.validate_python(graph_dict)
```
**Field Customisation**
Pydantic `Field`s no longer accept arbitrary args.
Now, you must put all additional arbitrary args in a `json_schema_extra` arg on the field.
**Schema Customisation**
FastAPI and pydantic schema generation now follows the OpenAPI version 3.1 spec.
This necessitates two changes:
- Our schema customization logic has been revised
- Schema parsing to build node templates has been revised
The specific aren't important, but this does present additional surface area for bugs.
**Performance Improvements**
Pydantic v2 is a full rewrite with a rust backend. This offers a substantial performance improvement (pydantic claims 5x to 50x depending on the task). We'll notice this the most during serialization and deserialization of sessions/graphs, which happens very very often - a couple times per node.
I haven't done any benchmarks, but anecdotally, graph execution is much faster. Also, very larges graphs - like with massive iterators - are much, much faster.
