This fixes a weird issue where the list images method needed to handle `None` for its `limit` and `offset` arguments, in order to get a count of all intermediates.
On our local installs this will be a very minor change. For those running on remote servers, load times should be slightly improved.
It's a small change but I think correct.
This should prevent `index.html` from *ever* being cached, so UIs will never be out of date.
Minor organisation to accomodate this.
Deleting old unused files from the early days
## What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
- [ ] Refactor
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Optimization
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Community Node Submission
## Description
This PR adds the ability to pass multiple images to a single IP-Adapter
(note the difference from using _multiple IP-Adapters at once_, which is
already supported.). The image embeddings are combined in the IP-Adapter
attention layers. This is the same strategy for combining multiple
images as used in Insta-LoRA workflows
(https://civitai.com/articles/2345).
This PR only adds multi-image support in the backend and the node
editor. The Linear UI still needs to be updated.
## QA Instructions, Screenshots, Recordings
I have manually tested the following via the workflow editor:
- Multiple images with a single IP-Adapter
- Multiple images per IP-Adapter, and multiple IP-Adapters
- Both standard and sequential conditioning
- IP-Adapters still work in the Linear UI.
Please hammer at this feature some more with manual testing.
## Added/updated tests?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No
I updated the existing IP-Adapter smoke test, but it provides pretty
limited coverage of this feature. This feature would probably be best
tested by an end-to-end workflow test, which is not currently supported.
(I'm hoping to put some effort into workflow-level testing soon.)
## What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
- [ ] Refactor
- [ ] Feature
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Optimization
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Community Node Submission
## Have you discussed this change with the InvokeAI team?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No, because:
## Description
fix(ui): use pidi processor for sketch control adapters
Also, the PREVIOUS commit (@8d3885d, which was already pushed to github repo) was wrongly commented, but too late to fix without a force push or other mucking that I'm reluctant to do. That commit is actually the one that has all the changes to diffusers_pipeline.py to use additional arg down_intrablock_additional_residuals (introduced in diffusers PR https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/5362) to detangle T2I-Adapter from ControlNet inputs to main UNet.
Upgrade pydantic and fastapi to latest.
- pydantic~=2.4.2
- fastapi~=103.2
- fastapi-events~=0.9.1
**Big Changes**
There are a number of logic changes needed to support pydantic v2. Most changes are very simple, like using the new methods to serialized and deserialize models, but there are a few more complex changes.
**Invocations**
The biggest change relates to invocation creation, instantiation and validation.
Because pydantic v2 moves all validation logic into the rust pydantic-core, we may no longer directly stick our fingers into the validation pie.
Previously, we (ab)used models and fields to allow invocation fields to be optional at instantiation, but required when `invoke()` is called. We directly manipulated the fields and invocation models when calling `invoke()`.
With pydantic v2, this is much more involved. Changes to the python wrapper do not propagate down to the rust validation logic - you have to rebuild the model. This causes problem with concurrent access to the invocation classes and is not a free operation.
This logic has been totally refactored and we do not need to change the model any more. The details are in `baseinvocation.py`, in the `InputField` function and `BaseInvocation.invoke_internal()` method.
In the end, this implementation is cleaner.
**Invocation Fields**
In pydantic v2, you can no longer directly add or remove fields from a model.
Previously, we did this to add the `type` field to invocations.
**Invocation Decorators**
With pydantic v2, we instead use the imperative `create_model()` API to create a new model with the additional field. This is done in `baseinvocation.py` in the `invocation()` wrapper.
A similar technique is used for `invocation_output()`.
**Minor Changes**
There are a number of minor changes around the pydantic v2 models API.
**Protected `model_` Namespace**
All models' pydantic-provided methods and attributes are prefixed with `model_` and this is considered a protected namespace. This causes some conflict, because "model" means something to us, and we have a ton of pydantic models with attributes starting with "model_".
Forunately, there are no direct conflicts. However, in any pydantic model where we define an attribute or method that starts with "model_", we must tell set the protected namespaces to an empty tuple.
```py
class IPAdapterModelField(BaseModel):
model_name: str = Field(description="Name of the IP-Adapter model")
base_model: BaseModelType = Field(description="Base model")
model_config = ConfigDict(protected_namespaces=())
```
**Model Serialization**
Pydantic models no longer have `Model.dict()` or `Model.json()`.
Instead, we use `Model.model_dump()` or `Model.model_dump_json()`.
**Model Deserialization**
Pydantic models no longer have `Model.parse_obj()` or `Model.parse_raw()`, and there are no `parse_raw_as()` or `parse_obj_as()` functions.
Instead, you need to create a `TypeAdapter` object to parse python objects or JSON into a model.
```py
adapter_graph = TypeAdapter(Graph)
deserialized_graph_from_json = adapter_graph.validate_json(graph_json)
deserialized_graph_from_dict = adapter_graph.validate_python(graph_dict)
```
**Field Customisation**
Pydantic `Field`s no longer accept arbitrary args.
Now, you must put all additional arbitrary args in a `json_schema_extra` arg on the field.
**Schema Customisation**
FastAPI and pydantic schema generation now follows the OpenAPI version 3.1 spec.
This necessitates two changes:
- Our schema customization logic has been revised
- Schema parsing to build node templates has been revised
The specific aren't important, but this does present additional surface area for bugs.
**Performance Improvements**
Pydantic v2 is a full rewrite with a rust backend. This offers a substantial performance improvement (pydantic claims 5x to 50x depending on the task). We'll notice this the most during serialization and deserialization of sessions/graphs, which happens very very often - a couple times per node.
I haven't done any benchmarks, but anecdotally, graph execution is much faster. Also, very larges graphs - like with massive iterators - are much, much faster.
There's a bug in chrome that screws with headers on fetch requests and 307 responses. This causes images to fail to copy in the commercial environment.
This change attempts to get around this by copying images in a different way (similar to how the canvas works). When the user requests a copy we:
- create an `<img />` element
- set `crossOrigin` if needed
- add an onload handler:
- create a canvas element
- draw image onto it
- export canvas to blob
This is wrapped in a promise which resolves to the blob, which can then be copied to clipboard.
---
A customized version of Konva's `useImage` hook is also included, which returns the image blob in addition to the `<img />` element. Unfortunately, this hook is not suitable for use across the app, because it does all the image fetching up front, regardless of whether we actually want to copy the image.
In other words, we'd have to fetch the whole image file even if the user is just skipping through image metadata, in order to have the blob to copy. The callback approach means we only fetch the image when the user clicks copy. The hook is thus currently unused.
## What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
- [ ] Refactor
- [ ] Feature
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Optimization
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Community Node Submission
## Have you discussed this change with the InvokeAI team?
- [x] Yes
- [ ] No, because:
## Description
Fix for breaking change in `python-socketio` 5.10.0 in which
`enter_room` and `leave_room` were made coroutines.
## Related Tickets & Documents
<!--
For pull requests that relate or close an issue, please include them
below.
For example having the text: "closes #1234" would connect the current
pull
request to issue 1234. And when we merge the pull request, Github will
automatically close the issue.
-->
- Closes#4899
## What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
- [ ] Refactor
- [ ] Feature
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Optimization
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Community Node Submission
## Description
fix(ui): fix control adapter translation string
Missed this during a previous change
## Related Tickets & Documents
<!--
For pull requests that relate or close an issue, please include them
below.
For example having the text: "closes #1234" would connect the current
pull
request to issue 1234. And when we merge the pull request, Github will
automatically close the issue.
-->
Reported by @Harvester62 :
https://discord.com/channels/1020123559063990373/1054129386447716433/1162018775437148160
