* introduce new abstraction layer for GPU devices
* add unit test for device abstraction
* fix ruff
* convert TorchDeviceSelect into a stateless class
* move logic to select context-specific execution device into context API
* add mock hardware environments to pytest
* remove dangling mocker fixture
* fix unit test for running on non-CUDA systems
* remove unimplemented get_execution_device() call
* remove autocast precision
* Multiple changes:
1. Remove TorchDeviceSelect.get_execution_device(), as well as calls to
context.models.get_execution_device().
2. Rename TorchDeviceSelect to TorchDevice
3. Added back the legacy public API defined in `invocation_api`, including
choose_precision().
4. Added a config file migration script to accommodate removal of precision=autocast.
* add deprecation warnings to choose_torch_device() and choose_precision()
* fix test crash
* remove app_config argument from choose_torch_device() and choose_torch_dtype()
---------
Co-authored-by: Lincoln Stein <lstein@gmail.com>
`LatentsField` objects have an optional `seed` field. This should only be populated when the latents are noise, generated from a seed.
`DenoiseLatentsInvocation` needs a seed value for scheduler initialization. It's used in a few places, and there is some logic for determining the seed to use with a series of fallbacks:
- Use the seed from the noise (a `LatentsField` object)
- Use the seed from the latents (a `LatentsField` object - normally it won't have a seed)
- Use `0` as a final fallback
In `DenoisLatentsInvocation`, we set the seed in the `LatentsOutput`, even though the output latents are not noise.
This is normally fine, but when we use refiner, we re-use the those same latents for the refiner denoise. This causes that characteristic same-seed-fried look on the refiner pass.
Simple fix - do not set the field in the output latents.
The previous algorithm errored if the image wasn't divisible by the tile size. I've reimplemented it from scratch to mitigate this issue.
The new algorithm is simpler. We create a pool of tiles, then use them to create an image composed completely of tiles. If there is any awkwardly sized space on the edge of the image, the tiles are cropped to fit.
Finally, paste the original image over the tile image.
I've added a jupyter notebook to do a smoke test of infilling methods, and 10 test images.
The other infill algorithms can be easily tested with the notebook on the same images, though I didn't set that up yet.
Tested and confirmed this gives results just as good as the earlier infill, though of course they aren't the same due to the change in the algorithm.
