This issue is caused by a race condition. When a large image is served to the client, it is done using a streaming `FileResponse`. This concurrently serves the image straight from disk. The file is kept open by FastAPI until the image is fully served.
When a user deletes an image before the file is done serving, the delete fails because the file is still held by FastAPI.
To reproduce the issue:
- Create a very large image (8k reliably creates the issue).
- Create a smaller image, so that the first image in the gallery is not the large image.
- Refresh the app. The small image should be selected.
- Select the large image and immediately delete it. You have to be fast, to delete it before it finishes loading.
- In the terminal, we expect to see an error saying `Failed to delete image file`, and the image does not disappear from the UI.
- After a short wait, once the image has fully loaded, try deleting it again. We expect this to work.
The workaround is to instead serve the image from memory.
Loading the image to memory is very fast, so there is only a tiny window in which we could create the race condition, but it technically could still occur, because FastAPI is asynchronous and handles requests concurrently.
Once we load the image into memory, deletions of that image will work. Then we return a normal `Response` object with the image bytes. This is essentially what `FileResponse` does - except it uses `anyio.open_file`, which is async.
The tradeoff is that the server thread is blocked while opening the file. I think this is a fair tradeoff.
A future enhancement could be to implement soft deletion of images (db is already set up for this), and then clean up deleted image files on startup/shutdown. We could move back to using the async `FileResponse` for best responsiveness in the server without any risk of race conditions.
For some reason, I started getting this indefinite hang when the app checks if port 9090 is available. After some fiddling around, I found that adding a timeout resolves the issue.
I confirmed that the util still works by starting the app on 9090, then starting a second instance. The second instance correctly saw 9090 in use and moved to 9091.
Before this change, if you attempt to create an image that with a nonexistent board, we'd get an unhandled error when adding the image to a board. The record would be created, but file not, due to the structure of the code.
With this change, we now log a warning if we have a problem adding the image to the board, but the record and file are still created.
A future improvement would be to create a transaction for this part of the code, preventing some other situation that could result in only the record or only the file beings saved.
* use model_class.load_singlefile() instead of converting; works, but performance is poor
* adjust the convert api - not right just yet
* working, needs sql migrator update
* rename migration_11 before conflict merge with main
* Update invokeai/backend/model_manager/load/model_loaders/stable_diffusion.py
Co-authored-by: Ryan Dick <ryanjdick3@gmail.com>
* Update invokeai/backend/model_manager/load/model_loaders/stable_diffusion.py
Co-authored-by: Ryan Dick <ryanjdick3@gmail.com>
* implement lightweight version-by-version config migration
* simplified config schema migration code
* associate sdxl config with sdxl VAEs
* remove use of original_config_file in load_single_file()
---------
Co-authored-by: Lincoln Stein <lstein@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Dick <ryanjdick3@gmail.com>
Previously, we used `model_install_download_progress` for both download starting and progressing. When handling this event, we don't know which actual thing it represents.
Add `model_install_download_started` event to explicitly represent a model download started event.
* allow model patcher to optimize away the unpatching step when feasible
* remove lazy_offloading functionality
* allow model patcher to optimize away the unpatching step when feasible
* remove lazy_offloading functionality
* do not save original weights if there is a CPU copy of state dict
* Update invokeai/backend/model_manager/load/load_base.py
Co-authored-by: Ryan Dick <ryanjdick3@gmail.com>
* documentation fixes added during penultimate review
---------
Co-authored-by: Lincoln Stein <lstein@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kent Keirsey <31807370+hipsterusername@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Dick <ryanjdick3@gmail.com>
- Pass the seed from `latents_a` to the output latents. Fixed an issue where using `BlendLatentsInvocation` could result in different outputs during denoising even when the alpha or slerp weight was 0.
## Explanation
`LatentsField` has an optional `seed` field. During denoising, if this `seed` field is not present, we **fall back to 0 for the seed**. The seed is used during denoising in a few ways:
1. Initializing the scheduler.
The seed is used in two places in `invokeai/app/invocations/latent.py`.
The `get_scheduler()` utility function has special handling for `DPMSolverSDEScheduler`, which appears to need a seed for deterministic outputs.
`DenoiseLatentsInvocation.init_scheduler()` has special handling for schedulers that accept a generator - the generator needs to be seeded in a particular way. At the time of this commit, these are the Invoke-supported schedulers that need this seed:
- DDIMScheduler
- DDPMScheduler
- DPMSolverMultistepScheduler
- EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler
- EulerDiscreteScheduler
- KDPM2AncestralDiscreteScheduler
- LCMScheduler
- TCDScheduler
2. Adding noise during inpainting.
If a mask is used for denoising, and we are not using an inpainting model, we add noise to the unmasked area. If, for some reason, we have a mask but no noise, the seed is used to add noise.
I wonder if we should instead assert that if a mask is provided, we also have noise.
This is done in `invokeai/backend/stable_diffusion/diffusers_pipeline.py` in `StableDiffusionGeneratorPipeline.latents_from_embeddings()`.
When we create noise to be used in denoising, we are expected to set `LatentsField.seed` to the seed used to create the noise. This introduces some awkwardness when we manipulate any "latents" that will be used for denoising. We have to pass the seed along for every operation.
If the wrong seed or no seed is passed along, we can get unexpected outputs during denoising. One notable case relates to blending latents (slerping tensors).
If we slerp two noise tensors (`LatentsField`s) _without_ passing along the seed from the source latents, when we denoise with a seed-dependent scheduler*, the schedulers use the fallback seed of 0 and we get the wrong output. This is most obvious when slerping with a weight of 0, in which case we expect the exact same output after denoising.
*It looks like only the DPMSolver* schedulers are affected, but I haven't tested all of them.
Passing the seed along in the output fixes this issue.
